iPad in da House

A few posts back, I noted that new artifacts are always to some extent “underdetermined”; that is, different groups will often have conflicting opinions as to what the new artifact actually is, and what it is good for. One current example of this phenomenon is some recent discourse surrounding Apple’s sexy new tablet: the iPad.

Earlier this week, a colleague and good friend of mine from the UK sent me a news story about a member of Parliament reading her speech from an iPad instead of a printed piece of paper. At first I was perplexed, as I couldn’t imagine why this was newsworthy, but the article explained that this was indeed the first instance of an MP using the new tablet device (instead of the more traditional printed paper) during a speech. It also explained that electronic devices like laptop computers have always been banned from the chamber. But the iPad posed a bit of a quandary: is it just a portable computer in a different form-factor, or is it more akin to electronic paper? How you answer that question determines whether the MP’s use of the iPad was appropriate or not.

As it turns out, the iPad has recently made a few appearances in other political assemblies as well. In June of last year, a similar incident happened in the German Parliament, where the use of laptops is also banned. In December of last year, US Representative Henry Cuellar (D-TX) was questioned over his use of an iPad during his speech. In his defense, he wittily replied “I’m not using it to play Angry Birds!”

It seems that the US House of Representatives, like many parliamentary bodies, has traditionally banned the use of electronic devices, especially those that can receive and transmit information over communication networks. Interestingly, the reason is not based on a concern for security; rather, it is a concern for “decorum” and the need for representatives to avoid outside distractions while in session. Laptop computers and mobile phones fall into this category of “distracting devices,” but the US house does currently allow “unobtrusive handheld electronic devices” such as Blackberrys, and now it would seem, iPads.

Why are iPads allowed while laptop computers are not? If you try to answer this from a technical perspective, you would just become frustrated. After all, an iPad is really just a somewhat-simplified laptop computer in a different form factor, and it can offer up just as many distractions (if not more) as a full-fledged laptop. To answer this, we need to remove our engineering caps, and don our sociological ones instead.

The difference between the two really lies in the social meanings this culture attaches to the respective devices. At some point in the past, these politicians achieved some degree of “closure” on their meaning of the laptop computer, characterizing it as a device that is too distracting for use within the chamber (for the concept of closure, see the SCOT framework developed by Pinch and Bijker). When the iPad was introduced, the culture was faced with the task of constructing a meaning for the new device, and as is typical, different groups within the culture have tried to characterize it in terms of categories they already knew. Some have argued that it should be banned because it is just like a laptop computer, while others have advocated that it should be allowed, because it is just an electronic version of the paper and pens they already condone.

Those of us in education will also soon face this same quandary (if you haven’t already). The iPad is a perfect medium for interactive textbooks and could become a decent note-taking device if Apple devises an easier method for silent text input (perhaps a chording keyboard?) Should we resist it, arguing that it is too much of a temptation towards distraction? Or should we embrace it and actively try to shape it into something beneficial for students? I think the latter is possible, but only by conscious, active engagement at this most-critical stage of adoption.

5 thoughts on “iPad in da House

  1. Ian Martin

    Interesting this thing about form factor and social meanings. I read Paul Atkinson’s Computer recently and he argues that one of the reasons that the first incarnation of pen and tablet computers were largely rejected by business managers because they were too closely associated with clipboards and form filling. Menial tasks such as these did not suit the hands-off image required of the busy executive. It would seem that the iPad’s similarity to an A4 piece of paper (in length, breadth and increasingly depth!) may allow it to invigorate the places laptops have failed to reach.

    Reply
  2. David Stearns Post author

    Thanks for the tip on Atkinson’s book–it sounds fascinating. This reminds me of my father’s attitudes towards the computer: he had one on his desk at work, but never turned it on. To him, it was too much like a typewriter, which was something secretaries used, not managers. He used voicemail all the time though, as the telephone was a managerial instrument.

    Reply
  3. Pingback: Google Doodle for Bob Moog’s Birthday | tech.soul.culture

  4. Rosie Perera

    I think the form factor *is* part of it. When you have a laptop open, the screen becomes a barrier between you and the others in the room. When you’re looking down at an iPad, merely to read from it, it doesn’t divide you from others in the room any more than looking at a piece of paper would.

    Of course the possible distractions on an iPad are numerous, but self-discipline can prevent you from playing games or surfing the web in the middle of a meeting. The question remains: do we as a generation have that kind of self-discipline anymore?

    I’m increasingly seeing and hearing of tablets being used in place of paper in all kinds of contexts, pastors preaching from them being the one most likely to raise eyebrows among a certain more conservative set. I spoke from my tablet for the first time ever at the Digital Society Conference. I liked the experience, and was glad to have saved a few sheets of paper. I think I’m going to use it next time I preach. I wonder how folks in my church will respond to that. I’m the only one I’ve ever seen bring a digital device (my iPod Touch) into church to use a Bible app (Logos).

    Reply

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s